15 Best Condoms, According to Gynecologists



milk allergy and lactose intolerance :: Article Creator

Got (Non-Dairy) Milk? This Lawsuit Says Starbucks Customers Shouldn't Have To Pay Extra

Got (Non-Dairy) Milk? This Lawsuit Says Consumers Shouldn't Have to Pay ExtraThe Recorder Page Printed From:

https://www.Law.Com/therecorder/2024/03/14/got-non-dairy-milk-this-lawsuit-says-starbucks-customers-shouldnt-have-to-pay-extra/

NEWS

This suit was surfaced by Law.Com Radar, ALM's source for immediate alerting on just filed cases in state and federal courts. Law.Com Radar now offers state court coverage nationwide. Sign up today and be first to know about new suits in your region, practice area or client sector.

March 14, 2024 at 05:21 PM

3 minute read

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know
  • A lawsuit filed in California federal court alleges Starbucks' non-dairy milk surcharge violates the Amercians with Disabilities Act.
  • The complaint proposes two classes, one national and one California-based, for consumers.
  • A spokesperson for Starbucks said the company does not comment on pending litigation.
  • A class action complaint against Starbucks filed this week alleges the company's policy of including a surcharge for alternative non-dairy milks violates the Americans with Disabilities Act and California law.

    This suit was surfaced by Law.Com Radar, ALM's source for immediate alerting on just filed cases in state and federal courts. Law.Com Radar now offers state court coverage nationwide. Sign up today and be first to know about new suits in your region, practice area or client sector.

    Want to continue reading?Become an ALM Digital Reader for Free! Benefits of a Digital Membership
  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics
  • Register Now

    Sign In Now

    You Might Like image

    2 minute read

    image

    3 minute read

    image

    4 minute read

    image

    1 minute read

  • {{ lawfirm }}

    {{count}} new blips

  • {{ lawfirm }}

    {{count}} new blips

  • {{#unless content.Trending.User}} {{ else }} {{/unless}} ]]> Featured Firms

    Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates P.C.

    75 Ponce De Leon Ave NE Ste 101

    Atlanta, GA 30308

    (470) 294-1674

    www.Garymartinhays.Com

    Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone

    2 Oliver St #608

    Boston, MA 02109

    (857) 444-6468

    www.Marksalomone.Com

    Smith & Hassler

    1225 N Loop W #525

    Houston, TX 77008

    (713) 739-1250

    www.Smithandhassler.Com

    Presented by BigVoodoo

    More From ALM Premium Subscription With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.View Now Team Accounts Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.View Now Bundle Subscriptions Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.View Now From Data to Decisions Dynamically explore and compare data on law firms, companies, individual lawyers, and industry trends. Exclusive Depth and Reach. Law.Com Compass includes access to our exclusive industry reports, combining the unmatched expertise of our analyst team with ALM's deep bench of proprietary information to provide insights that can't be found anywhere else. Big Pictures and Fine Details Law.Com Compass delivers you the full scope of information, from the rankings of the Am Law 200 and NLJ 500 to intricate details and comparisons of firms' financials, staffing, clients, news and events. Florida Legal Awards 2024 April 04, 2024Miami, FL

    Daily Business Review honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Florida.

    Learn More ATTORNEY

    Hankin Sandman Palladino Weintrob & BellAtlantic City-based law firm seeking an Associate with 0 to 5 years of experience to work in the...

    Apply Now › ANSELL GRIMM & AARON 03/04/2024New Jersey Law Journal

    Welcome Judge Joseph Quinn (Ret.) The Honorable Joseph P. Quinn, J.S.C., retired New Jersey Superior Court Judge, served for 23 years in the court s Civil, Chancery, and Family Divisions, where he was a strong proponent of mediation and alternate dispute resolution. As the head of Ansell.Law s mediation practice, Judge Quinn provides a valuable resource to parties seeking a final and efficient resolution of their disputes. ANSELL GRIMM & AARON, PC 732-922-1000 https://ansell.Law/

    View Announcement ›

    Subscribe to The Recorder

    Unlimited access to The Recorder

    Access to additional free ALM publications

    1 free article* across the ALM subscription network every 30 days

    Exclusive discounts on ALM events and publications


    Starbucks Faces Lawsuit For Charging Extra For Nondairy Milk In Drinks

    Three lactose-intolerant women are steamed over a surcharge for nondairy milk substitutions in Starbucks beverages.

    California residents Maria Bollinger, Dawn Miller and Shunda Smith filed a lawsuit earlier this month in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, alleging the coffee giant discriminated against customers with lactose allergies by charging them an extra fee for nondairy alternatives to its coffee-based drinks and other beverages.

    "Starbucks charges customers with lactose intolerance and milk allergies an excessively high Surcharge to substitute Non-Dairy Alternatives in its drinks," according to the complaint, which seeks restitution as well as monetary damages.

    The "excessively high" fee alleged in the suit involves a surcharge ranging from 50 cents to 80 cents on Starbucks beverages that contain nondairy, lactose-free options, such as soy, almond, coconut, oat and other plant-based milks.

    Lactose intolerance, which affects 30 million to 50 million Americans, qualifies as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The plaintiffs claim that by charging extra for plant-based milks in their beverages, Starbucks violated their rights under the ADA and California Unruh Civil Rights Act, a law that bars businesses from discriminating against residents of the state on the basis of age, race, sex, disability and other criteria.

    A Starbucks spokesperson said the company can't comment on pending litigation, but noted that domestic customers do have nondairy options at no extra charge.

    "In U.S. Starbucks stores, at no additional cost, customers can add up to four ounces of nondairy milk to hot or iced brewed coffee or tea, cold brew and Americano beverages," the spokesperson said.

    Members of the Starbucks' Rewards loyalty program also can redeem points to get nondairy milk when it is not part of the standard recipe.

    "Additionally, customers can choose to customize any beverage with a non-dairy milk on the menu for an additional charge. This is similar to other beverage customizations, such as an additional espresso shot or syrup, the Starbucks spokesperson added, noting that pricing varies by market.

    Story continues

    Starbucks isn't the only restaurant chain to come under fire for tacking on charges for plant-based milk. Dunkin' in January was hit with a similar suit, while a number of other coffee sellers around the country are also being called out for nondairy milk charges.

    College students surprise a beloved security guard with a trip to Nigeria to see family

    Why a judge dismissed some charges against Trump, others in Georgia election case

    How immigration contributes to job growth and demand


    People Are Once Again Claiming Raw Milk Is Good For You – Here's Why It's Not

    Pasteurization is right up there with hand-washing and vaccines as one of the greatest public health achievements in human history. But just like the other things on that list, it has its detractors. Loud ones. 

    Fact-checking organization Full Fact recently responded to an Instagram post that has totted up over 70,000 likes at the time of writing, one of many espousing the bullshit disputed idea that unpasteurized "raw" milk is a health food. So, we felt the time was ripe for a reminder of why science tells us that chugging untreated pints of the white stuff is often a very bad idea.

    What is pasteurization?

    Named for French scientist Louis Pasteur, who demonstrated that applying heat could prevent wine and beer from going bad in the 1860s, pasteurization is the process of heat-treating milk to kill harmful microbes and increase shelf-life.

    There are a few different methods, but all involve the milk being heated to specific temperatures and held there for a predetermined period of time, which has been calculated as sufficient to kill the bacteria, like Mycobacterium tuberculosis, that can be hiding inside.

    You may also have seen products labeled as "UHT", which stands for ultra-heat treated. This is a more extreme form of pasteurization involving higher temperatures and sterile packaging, allowing these kinds of products to be stored out of the fridge for months at a time. 

    Milk is not the only foodstuff that gets pasteurized. Other examples of foods that can be heat-treated include fruit juices, flour, and Pasteur's original research subject, alcoholic beverages.

    Why do some people drink raw milk?

    Almost as soon as pasteurization became standard practice, the controversy began. According to the Science History Institute, some local media organizations were asking questions about "cooking" milk as far back as the early 20th century, and the skepticism from some quarters has never really gone away.

    Over the decades, many claims have been made about the supposed benefits of unpasteurized dairy products. Here are a few of them.

    "It tastes better."

    Some people simply say they prefer the flavor of raw milk. There are also some artisanal cheeses that are traditionally made with raw milk, which connoisseurs may be tempted to sample.

    This is one that's difficult to disprove with scientific research. Suffice it to say, even if you do think it tastes a bit better, most would agree the risks of raw milk (see below) significantly outweigh this.

    "It's easier to digest."

    Some have claimed that treating milk with heat to kill the bad bacteria has a knock-on effect of killing probiotic organisms that secrete lactase, the enzyme that breaks down lactose and that those with lactose intolerance are lacking.

    There is no scientific evidence to back up this claim. Raw milk still contains lactose and there's no indication it contains lactase. The pasteurization process is also not the cause of lactose intolerance, which we know from genetic evidence has been around for thousands of years. 

    "It's healthier."

    Some suggest that the pasteurization process negatively affects the nutritional profile of the milk by degrading nutrients like calcium, essential for healthy bone development. There have also been claims about the supposed immune benefits of raw milk.

    Much of this is also tied in with wider skepticism around consuming processed foods, or supposedly "unnatural" products.

    The evidence suggests that pasteurization does not alter the nutritional content of milk in any significant way. Even where some studies have found decreases in the levels of certain vitamins after heat treatment, these are not vitamins that are found at particularly high levels in milk and thus can be obtained from other, more important dietary sources. 

    There is some evidence that children raised on farms have a lower incidence of some allergies and autoimmune conditions, and improved immune function, which some have attributed to raw milk consumption. Importantly, though, even these studies agree that there would need to be a better way of mitigating the very real risks from raw milk before more widespread consumption could be recommended.

    "It's fine as long as it's tested/organic/from a clean farm."

    Some believe that as long as they trust the farm where their raw milk comes from, it is safe to consume.

    However, in reality, there is no way to completely remove the risk. Even farms that regularly test for microbes in their milk may miss low levels of contamination that can still get you sick. Organic farming practices can't prevent contamination either, and even the healthiest animals can harbor bacteria that pose a threat to humans.

    What are the risks of drinking raw milk?

    As well as citing evidence that largely debunks the claims made by the anti-pasteurization league, health authorities like the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have repeatedly warned about the dangers of consuming raw milk. 

    The most obvious, and the reason pasteurization was adopted in the first place, is the risk of foodborne illness. 

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) explain that raw milk can carry several different bacteria that pose a risk to human health, including Campylobacter, Brucella, and Listeria. In fact, they say raw milk is "one of the riskiest foods" to consume.

    Infection with any of these species could see you saddled with days of diarrheal misery, but there are some potentially serious consequences too, particularly for those who may be more vulnerable such as children and pregnant people. It's not unheard of for humans to contract bovine tuberculosis from raw milk, and some of these other infections can cause complications including kidney failure.

    It's because of these risks that raw milk is illegal to purchase in several US states, and cannot be sold in high street stores in the UK. 

    The verdict? Pasteurized milk is much safer and no less healthy

    In a world where some people genuinely debate the utility of good hand hygiene, it's probably not surprising that raw milk has so many staunch supporters. But all the evidence suggests that consuming unpasteurized dairy is, at best, no better for you and, at worst, a one-way ticket to the ER. 

    If only there were an easy way to drastically reduce all the risks…

    All "explainer" articles are confirmed by fact checkers to be correct at time of publishing. Text, images, and links may be edited, removed, or added to at a later date to keep information current. 

    The content of this article is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of qualified health providers with questions you may have regarding medical conditions.  






    Comments

    Popular Posts

    Best Free LaTeX Editors for Windows 10 - TWCN Tech News

    Poor sleep may bolster genetic susceptibility to asthma risk | BMJ